|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 18 post(s) |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 17:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:This is not about threats in any way, I have had interest in playing a game where one builds creates, fights, wins and loses, and the result is the balance of ones own abilities, and that is balanced against those you meet.
I have Zero interest in playing a game where the result is decided by random chance or luck. I am buggered if I am going to spend months buying a capital and CCP luck decides whether it lives or dies. And then Grinding back up again. So I no longer have a goal.
Guess what happens next.
Not anger, not rage, just complete indifference to something I no longer care for. For me EVE no longer has a reason to exist, it has carelessly cast aside what made it worthwhile. man you must not have been playing eve for very long if you think that this is the only way that you can randomly lose a ship
between disconnects, bugs, the undock cone, 2500m warp variance, there's a whole hell of a lot of room for you to lose a ship due to bad luck
i'm sorry that your regimen for survival in wormhole space is being changed but you have to deal with it the way everyone else deals with chance |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 17:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote: If you really think that gutting the core concept of eve, where our actions and those actions of those you meet are what decide our experience, is a positive direction for EVE you are welcome to continue.
L M B O
please continue to spout melodrama |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 17:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
Syndiaan wrote: How about they apply this change to jump bridges as well, think you would be whistling a different tune then.
fine by me
jump bridges already spout you out 5km from the module, you have to burn back to jump back through
also if the aperture is wide enough, there's a chance that you'd land inside the JB pos which would be hilarious |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 17:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote:Syndiaan wrote: How about they apply this change to jump bridges as well, think you would be whistling a different tune then.
fine by me jump bridges already spout you out 5km from the module, you have to burn back to jump back through also if the aperture is wide enough, there's a chance that you'd land inside the JB pos which would be hilarious Now try random with your fleet spread out all throughout a great sphere of space. While jumping into combat, out of refit range. I wish you everything you have wished others and everything you deserve. lawl you really have no idea what jump bridges are for do you
nothing you have described in your post is even remotely a concern when using a jump bridge
also please [TELL] me about the varied and sundry refit opportunities available for ships that can use a jump bridge (note: capital ships cannot use jump bridges)
keep in mind that no one will ever fly a nestor until it gets a covert jump drive |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 17:59:00 -
[5] - Quote
i get that you are trying to draw an analog to a fixture of owning sov here, and one that you perceive to be both emotionally charged and draped in entitlement in order to draw out a kneejerk, emotional response
however this only really works if you actually know what you're talking about
this isn't the same thing as daring to comment on nullsec game features while being a self-identifying wormhole dweller -- we in nullsec welcome all opinions as long as said opinion havers have a basic clue about what they're talking about
you don't |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:00:00 -
[6] - Quote
Syndiaan wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote:Syndiaan wrote: How about they apply this change to jump bridges as well, think you would be whistling a different tune then.
fine by me jump bridges already spout you out 5km from the module, you have to burn back to jump back through also if the aperture is wide enough, there's a chance that you'd land inside the JB pos which would be hilarious 20km and 5km is a very big difference, and not just talking about where your pos is, talking about your cyno jumps as well. Difference is you can call in backup if you get jumped. When your rolling a hole there is no backup if your getting jumped. It's just rip out your implants and go grab a smoke. nice -- you realize that you're talking out of your ass re: jump bridges and now have expanded the parameters to include something completely unrelated |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:03:00 -
[7] - Quote
hint: capital ships are not the only ships in the game
there are these things called subcaps which enjoy greater mobility and tend to be more useful in situations where you need to be more mobile |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:04:00 -
[8] - Quote
subcaps by and large cannot refit in combat so you have to, gasp, pick one fit that will work for most everything you encounter
I get that rooks and kings put out a video a couple of years ago that was cool but emulating them is not the only valid way to play eve |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:12:00 -
[9] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote: What fleet comps? There are none you You CANNOT REINFORCE,!!!!
That is what a mass limit means!
smaller ships have lower mass
this means you can bring more of them
there are ships in eve that are not capital ships |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:14:00 -
[10] - Quote
some serious rooks and kings cargo culting going on itt
or perhaps itwhs (in this wormhole space) |
|

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:19:00 -
[11] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote:epicurus ataraxia wrote: What fleet comps? There are none you You CANNOT REINFORCE,!!!!
That is what a mass limit means!
smaller ships have lower mass this means you can bring more of them there are ships in eve that are not capital ships Yes there are. And as you have no clue whatsoever about why a capital ship is utilised, then you have no Idea how bat **** crazy that sounds. and now capital ships actually have a modicum of risk to attack with, horror of horrors
you don't need capships to pvp, nor do you need them to siege a pos
for more information look up the stealth bomber class frigate |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:19:00 -
[12] - Quote
Syndiaan wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote:epicurus ataraxia wrote: What fleet comps? There are none you You CANNOT REINFORCE,!!!!
That is what a mass limit means!
smaller ships have lower mass this means you can bring more of them there are ships in eve that are not capital ships have you ever tried rolling a c5/6 wormhole with only sub caps? i'm sure it sucks
the alternative is to accept the risk, or (gasp) don't roll at all |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:21:00 -
[13] - Quote
Maduin Shi wrote:Retar Aveymone wrote: Nullsec has been desperately agitating for changes. As nullsec requires adaptability nullsec does not have the same reflexive rage at changes in mechanics that require you to adapt: in fact, veterans relish mechanics changeups that force us out of sclerotic ways of doing things that were optimized years ago and force us to use our noggins.
Great lets put this change on cynos, jump bridges and nullsec stargates and we'll see how you guys "adapt". I would relish the feedback thread. the distance thing already exists on gates, is meaningless on jump bridges, and anything that comes through a cyno in nullsec has the EHP to deal with it
but by all means continue tossing darts at the Perceived Nullsec Entitlement board to see if you can get a bullseye |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:24:00 -
[14] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote:Syndiaan wrote: have you ever tried rolling a c5/6 wormhole with only sub caps?
i'm sure it sucks the alternative is to accept the risk, or (gasp) don't roll at all That is exactly the solution, so no more PVP, shame. You do actually understand that this prevents searching for ships to shoot? seeing as this change does not remove rolling holes and is not removing the ability to scan down chains of holes for pvp, I fail to see your point
now if you are arguing that it removes risk-free searching for PvP then yes, that is the entire point |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:29:00 -
[15] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:I'm bored with this, there's no hope of explaining colour to a blind man. They will never understand. Good luck. Maybe see you in a couple of years. If there is anything worth doing by then. we understand bitter, entrenched entitlement better than you ever will |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:30:00 -
[16] - Quote
also ending every post with how little you care about the subject is sure to lend all kinds of credence to your opinion |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:32:00 -
[17] - Quote
see also: how many accounts you are unsubscribing due to your change
man I sure am motivated by folks using their subscription dollars as a hostage |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:36:00 -
[18] - Quote
Quote:Syndiaan wrote:seeing as this change does not remove rolling holes and is not removing the ability to scan down chains of holes for pvp, I fail to see your point
now if you are arguing that it removes risk-free searching for PvP then yes, that is the entire point I dont understand how you consider jumping capitals over into a system where you can get rolled out with no backup to come help you is "risk free". In nullsec you just send out scouts to find pvp and then signal the fleet to come on over, sounds a lot less risky to me. ah yes getting rolled out hrm
let's examine the mass exhaustion experience, shall we
I warp to my static with three dreads or w/e
I jump through, then jump back when my session timer exhausts
there is a 10 second window in which a counter-exhausting force could jump through, assuming the client responds in time (which it usually does)
the opposing rollers would have to be set up on your wormhole waiting for you to jump in in order to do that, and even if they did, they would be trapped on YOUR side of the wormhole by doing something so monumentally stupid
and I guess they don't have scouts where you live as by your post they are a nullsec-only feature |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:46:00 -
[19] - Quote
Syndiaan wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote:ah yes getting rolled out hrm
let's examine the mass exhaustion experience, shall we
I warp to my static with three dreads or w/e
I jump through, then jump back when my session timer exhausts
there is a 10 second window in which a counter-exhausting force could jump through, assuming the client responds in time (which it usually does)
the opposing rollers would have to be set up on your wormhole waiting for you to jump in in order to do that, and even if they did, they would be trapped on YOUR side of the wormhole by doing something so monumentally stupid
and I guess they don't have scouts where you live as by your post they are a nullsec-only feature That is not true at all, they can have a capital ship cloaked up on your side and as soon as you jump your cap over to roll it they uncloak and jump theirs. you are now stuck on their side with a capital in your face and a subcap fleet showing up on D-scan. Granted yeah if you are rage rolling that is not an issue because you will have eyes on the hole the whole time. I still do not see how you can sit there and say "wahhhh, risk free boat is over" when all you guys do is use intel channels and frigate scouts. I don't get the "frigate scout" thing, it's not like covert ops frigates are banned from wspace, you guys use them too, what is even the deal with that
and yes, i was talking about rage rolling -- the idea of someone scrambling together a multi dread force in the 20, maybe 30 second window (the extra 10-20s is for your scout to bounce around the system a bit and dscan) to counter roll your hole like you describe is, frankly, ludicrous
it takes longer than that for the capital ships to even accelerate and decelerate from warp
it's that scenario in which hole rolling is safe (outside of pilot error) and the situation that this change is intending to dissolve |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:52:00 -
[20] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: it's that scenario in which hole rolling is safe (outside of pilot error) and the situation that this change is intending to dissolve
Which it absolutely does nothing to address in any meaningful way - the only time the supposed increased risk actually applies in a meaningful way is in fringe cases and in those fringe cases it has a hugely negative impact on smaller entities. Even your own post I'm quoting part from highlights that the risk factor isn't really a factor. cap ships landing outside of the activation range of the wormhole adds plenty of risk
a machariel is blessed with a generous top speed and cruiser-class warp speed -- it can easily land on the wormhole and bump a cap on grid before it can slowboat back to the hole
any caps attempting to warp to perches can be stymied by an interdictor, which is also blessed with a generous warp speed
sure, the caps will probably warp to their perch or celestial or whatever (luv 2 heat my mwds in caps to warp in 12s) but they sure as heck aren't making it back in range of the hole with a bubble on it
granted i am assuming perfect response times and no human error from either party in these scenarios but that is basically how everyone describes eve so here we are |
|

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:56:00 -
[21] - Quote
Syndiaan wrote:Why do you insist on wormhole people looking to find content to have to risk billions of isk in order to do so?
Yes we use cov ops to scout just like you, the difference is you don't have to roll holes or scan out the systems. Spend the time scanning out all the sigs in the chain, just to find out there is nothing there. Now we have to come back and deal with rolling the wormhole with capitals getting shot out 20km away, so the choice is to either warp off and warp back or slowboat in a capital 20km. After that is done guess what, rinse and repeat, sometimes can take 10 + times doing it before you find something worth doing. the point here is that you don't actually have to risk billions of isk to do so, it just makes it faster
a game mechanic becoming LESS feasible is not the same thing as making it UNFEASIBLE
the change is slowing down the rate at which you can do this by adding the risk + warp or slowboat factor |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 18:59:00 -
[22] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: cap ships landing outside of the activation range of the wormhole adds plenty of risk
a machariel is blessed with a generous top speed and cruiser-class warp speed -- it can easily land on the wormhole and bump a cap on grid before it can slowboat back to the hole
any caps attempting to warp to perches can be stymied by an interdictor, which is also blessed with a generous warp speed
sure, the caps will probably warp to their perch or celestial or whatever (luv 2 heat my mwds in caps to warp in 12s) but they sure as heck aren't making it back in range of the hole with a bubble on it
granted i am assuming perfect response times and no human error from either party in these scenarios but that is basically how everyone describes eve so here we are
It adds plenty of meaningless risk if there is no one there to exploit that risk and 99 times out of 100 there simply isn't someone there to exploit that risk while in the mean time adding extra tedium just to add risk to fringe cases. Is it really that difficult to understand? there's plenty of meaning -- it makes the activity interdictable by those with sharp reaction times and good planning where it could not realistically be interdicted before
the consistency at which the risk is realized is not and will never be an issue here |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 19:30:00 -
[23] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: there's plenty of meaning -- it makes the activity interdictable by those with sharp reaction times and good planning where it could not realistically be interdicted before
the consistency at which the risk is realized is not and will never be an issue here
The activity is already interdictable by those with sharp reaction times, good planning and the balls to go for it. not when you're rage rolling
an established hole, sure |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 19:51:00 -
[24] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: not when you're rage rolling
an established hole, sure
Even with the change no one is going to catch you rage rolling unless they already have probes out, a fleet ready to go and prepared to jump straight into a fight they have limited intel on - which almost never happens - is it really worth all the negatives to make this tiny fringe scenario a little tiny bit more feasible at best? It seems a lot of people really don't have even half a clue how wormhole space actually works.
at least there is a window now
36 seconds is better than 0 seconds
or do you think that the window should be increased |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 19:57:00 -
[25] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:Rroff wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: not when you're rage rolling
an established hole, sure
Even with the change no one is going to catch you rage rolling unless they already have probes out, a fleet ready to go and prepared to jump straight into a fight they have limited intel on - which almost never happens - is it really worth all the negatives to make this tiny fringe scenario a little tiny bit more feasible at best? It seems a lot of people really don't have even half a clue how wormhole space actually works. Really it is like young teenagers trying to be sex councillors. They have heard rumors of the mechanics, and one day might actually learn what's going on, probably mainly from pornography. God help them the first time they try, a large dose of reality awaits. Maybe they will have some ideas after being married and having actually lived it for a few years. what a wonderfully vague response
really you could mean anything by this
feel free to go into detail there Cochise, unless you are just trying to blow smoke up everyone's ass |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:03:00 -
[26] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: at least there is a window now
36 seconds is better than 0 seconds
or do you think that the window should be increased
A window at any cost? regardless of what else it might destroy? EDIT: PS you want to post on your actual character? i am generally in favor of things that take no risk being changed to engender risk, yes
also this is my main -- really, even if it wasn't, I'm a goon, what more identifying information do you need |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:06:00 -
[27] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:What you do in the bedroom is entirely your affair. I am pointing out that you know jackshit about wormholes and coming out with the most absurd ideas. Live in them a while and then your opinion might have some value when discussing changes to wormholes.
[citation needed] |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:07:00 -
[28] - Quote
Syndiaan wrote:Pretty sure he is saying you are in a null sec corp and do null sec stuff and trying to contribute to an aspect of the game you don't even participate in. doesn't stop y'all from trying to suggest changes for jump bridges, as evidenced by the last couple of pages on this thread
nullsec is willing to entertain all opinions, why can't you |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:12:00 -
[29] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: what a wonderfully vague response
really you could mean anything by this
feel free to go into detail there Cochise, unless you are just trying to blow smoke up everyone's ass
Did I miss a post where you gave a detailed explanation of why your for this change?, or even posting in this thread in the first place other than to try and stir people up? with all due/undue respect most of your posts seem to boil down to "it will increase risk duh!" while demonstrating only a vague knowledge of how the mechanics actually work in practise and missing some of the larger repercussions of the change due to missing the finer details. i understand the changes just fine, thanks -- eve is not particularly complicated
adding the minimum distance that you spawn when jumping through a wormhole makes it so you can't immediately bounce back through the wormhole
it also puts you at significant risk of being out of range of refit, which will make Rooks and Kings video style capital fights more difficult
note that this does not affect remote repair range; a triage archon has a range of 52.5km with its remote armor reps, which is well within the worst-case scenario of your capitals spawning the maximum distance apart
this has the knock on effect of making rage rolling, the current way by which wormhole groups find both PvE and PvP content, take longer
feel free to fill in any details that you are strenuously claiming I'm missing; without specific details you are just fronting for a nuance that does not exist
remember -- you're not trying to convince me, you're trying to convince CCP
CCP needs these details, should they exist, way more than I do
your repeated, coruscating failure to provide said details means they might as well not exist |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:15:00 -
[30] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote:Syndiaan wrote:Pretty sure he is saying you are in a null sec corp and do null sec stuff and trying to contribute to an aspect of the game you don't even participate in. doesn't stop y'all from trying to suggest changes for jump bridges, as evidenced by the last couple of pages on this thread nullsec is willing to entertain all opinions, why can't you Largely it was attempts to draw parallels to what kind of change in null would be an approximate of this change and the reaction suggesting that kind of change would have from people who were connected to nullsec rather than an attack on nullsec. ah so you are allowed to make parallels and we aren't, I see
when we dared to compare the random spawn distance to gate jump locations, the chorus of opinion from this thread clamored to assert that the two were not even remotely similar
also trying to liken jump bridges as a parallel to this change was supremely stupid -- no combat occurs on jump bridges, ever, and nothing that can use a jump bridge has or uses a refit service |
|

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:19:00 -
[31] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:How many posts now? Well if you want a clear concise pr+¬cis, read Corbexx post, He nails it well.
corbexx's post gives his opinion on how the change will affect the game
the details for which I ask are to prove my supposed ignorance of wormhole space game mechanics, thus making or breaking my authority at which to speak on this topic
note that my alliance does not serve to prove or disprove said authority
please stay on target |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:20:00 -
[32] - Quote
Syndiaan wrote:Do you just have a personal hatred for wormhole people or something? So your idea of a good change is to make finding content in a game take longer and more frustrating? it's to give it the potential for being interdicted |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:25:00 -
[33] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: remember -- you're not trying to convince me, you're trying to convince CCP
CCP needs these details, should they exist, way more than I do
your repeated, coruscating failure to provide said details means they might as well not exist
If CCP wants these finer details they are more than free to take part in the topic here. Your posts demonstrates a theoretical knowledge of the application of these mechanics - as you said its not that complex but shows a lack of practical knowledge of how they tend to work out in actual use. (PS your not fooling me even if I am somewhat humouring you). then explain the details
doing so gives you an inviolate position of superiority and I can't understand why you aren't willing to seize something so simple |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:26:00 -
[34] - Quote
like i get opsec and everything but by all accounts itt your VERY WAY OF LIFE is in danger
if i were as entitled you can bet i'd be willing to part with damn near anything to help my case |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:34:00 -
[35] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote:epicurus ataraxia wrote:How many posts now? Well if you want a clear concise pr+¬cis, read Corbexx post, He nails it well.
corbexx's post gives his opinion on how the change will affect the game the details for which I ask are to prove my supposed ignorance of wormhole space game mechanics, thus making or breaking my authority at which to speak on this topic note that my alliance does not serve to prove or disprove said authority please stay on target You have no authority. You are simply a player expressing opinions on an area of space you have no reason to be concerned with. Your only input is whether you get caps away from nullsec holes so you can hotdrop them. It is not my role to educate you, you have a basic grasp of the concepts, but as you are not aware of the linking structures and effects across the whole of space, you have no concept as to how this affects the overall environment for players who DO live there. I have no desire to separate, the foolish from the sensible comments, I do not have that much patience. You have NO right to demand more. translation: there is actually nothing other than a strained attempt to leverage my membership in my alliance into a position of non-authority on the matter
please stow this tired argument from authority |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:38:00 -
[36] - Quote
Syndiaan wrote:I think you are overestimating how often rage rolling goes on. By all accounts in this thread it is the only thing that wormholers have TO do at all -- why else post with such apoplexy on the topic |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:41:00 -
[37] - Quote
Nolak Ataru wrote:Like I said before, are you gonna take car advice from the dude down the street who knows nothing on the subject (goons) or are you gonna go to the professionals (Literally any of the wh corps in this thread)?
At the same time, you're attempting to leverage your alliance membership into a position of someone who should be listened to, as opposed to being the tired kid at the mall who wants to go home right NOW and wants candy that he saw another kid get. Please leave wormhole space to wormhole residents, and stop talking out of your ass. It's bad enough that CCP Fozzie is currently talking out of his ass, let's not try to take his job away. your car analogy, which appreciated for being a car analogy (best analogies) is not particularly relevant to a video game like eve that rewards secrecy as much as it does -- for all you know, I could have a character in your corp right now, living in w-space
mechanics tend to self-identify as mechanics and don't have secret lives as florists or something similarly contrived
and who says I am leveraging my alliance membership into anything, i am not special and neither is my alliance, I am just one person talking about a video game |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:44:00 -
[38] - Quote
Syndiaan wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote:Syndiaan wrote:I think you are overestimating how often rage rolling goes on. By all accounts in this thread it is the only thing that wormholers have TO do at all -- why else post with such apoplexy on the topic That is a perfect example of why you should not be contributing to the discussion of this change if that is how you see wormholes. it's not how I see wormholes -- it's how self-identifying wormhole dwellers are representing themselves in the thread |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:46:00 -
[39] - Quote
here is debate 101 -- when arguing for something, you have to establish authority with facts and evidence
you can't put on a shirt with "AUTHORITY ABOUT [TOPIC]" and then deride your opponent for not wearing the same shirt |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:50:00 -
[40] - Quote
Nolak Ataru wrote: I don't know what you're trying to do with your mechanics thing, but please do enlighten me as to your reasoning for going to the dude who knows nothing instead of the people who know what they're doing.
If I must use a simpler analogy for your mind, would you ask a 5 day old character who just joined EVE about supercapital tactics and titan fits? No, because they don't know what you're talking about. And neither does 99% of the Goonswarm posts in this thread.
the point is that you can't establish who has the authority from their alliance tag because that is not how authority works
we don't establish that mechanics have authority because they walk down the street wearing a sandwich board with "MECHANIC" drawn on the front in crayon, we establish it with facts and evidence
the "I have an alt in your corp" nonsense is to illustrate that allegiances in this game are not as cut and dried as your alliance tag
and, again, if I'm so out of touch with how wormhole space works, feel free to drop some hard facts on me proving my ignorance |
|

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:56:00 -
[41] - Quote
Rroff wrote: But but I like my sandwich board with member of Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork on it :|
same except goonswarm federation |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:59:00 -
[42] - Quote
Rroff wrote:unimatrix0030 wrote:Faren Shalni wrote:Enthropic wrote:Why are you guys even feeding the goon troll? Because most here are used to a much better quality of troll. to the point its difficult to recognise a standard troll :) We should pay them in kind when the sov changes threads are up. Mutual Assured Destruction AKA MAD. Can you imagine all the "but your not a member of a nullsec corp/alliance so what would you know" put downs? lol point me at 'em when they come up and i'll strike them down just like I did here |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 21:06:00 -
[43] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote: You are not relevant, you bring nothing relevant, repeat, we do not care.
neither are you, seeing as you've given no proof that you know what the hell you're talking about |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 21:18:00 -
[44] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote:epicurus ataraxia wrote: You are not relevant, you bring nothing relevant, repeat, we do not care.
neither are you, seeing as you've given no proof that you know what the hell you're talking about Read what is already written, rather than demanding it all be explained personally to you. Come on the Goons have already got what you wanted, you won,you ****** up the game for others. just stop gloating. I did -- none of it actually proved that I don't know what I'm talking about
also I don't give a wet crap what goons want -- i speak for myself |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 21:25:00 -
[45] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: I did -- none of it actually proved that I don't know what I'm talking about
also I don't give a wet crap what goons want -- i speak for myself
All you proved is your versed in the theoretical mechanics and lack much knowledge of the practical mechanics - anyone with even a minimal amount of experience with the practical side knows that 3 caps will close the wh without any getting back for instance (not a method usually used for rolling unless your extracting). For yet more examples of some of the more finer points see corbexx's post above. you people keep saying that but are unable to come up with one example of what this means
why is this so difficult to do |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 21:37:00 -
[46] - Quote
corbexx wrote:Go on i'll bite cos i'm bored Promiscuous Female wrote: I did -- none of it actually proved that I don't know what I'm talking about
Ok so you have read my post whats wrong with it or what don't you agree with, or do you agree with it? your lengthy post, in general, has a fair assessment of how player behavior might change when the change goes through
however you are making a lot of assumptions on how people will react to things and I don't really agree with all of them but my opinions on how players will handle the change are similarly up in the air so I can't really concede or disagree meaningfully there
my main problem is that you're falling into the trap where refitting is some sacred cow that you are entitled to have -- it's difficult for me to sympathize with this (and, in fact, I would prefer that refitting be completely disallowed inside of the 15 minute aggression timer)
your proposed solution for controlling how far you appear from other people is basically garbage since no one in their right mind would jump through a wormhole at anything but the minimum required to land in refit, it's too optimizable and doesn't actually change anything
you're also warning of the dangers of people choosing to do nothing, which isn't really a danger
people are not required to prostate themselves towards your guns and allow you to destroy them, logging off is a valid option to deny you kills and make you go away
you end your post with another vague threat of unsubs, which is typical eve-o garbage which has never worked so I'm not sure why you bothered |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 21:40:00 -
[47] - Quote
unimatrix0030 wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: you people keep saying that but are unable to come up with one example of what this means
why is this so difficult to do
Hard to disprove your argument when you have none, then there are none we can disprove.
Bleedingthrough wrote:[quote=Promiscuous Female] Maybe because this is not a "101- help the newbie" thread. These guys don't need to explain what is obvious for everyone living in w-space.
hey -- if you guys want to sabotage your chances of making any change in line with your own desires by deliberately withholding information from the very people you deride as not understanding how your infinitely subtle and complex game environment (lol) works, then continue shooting yourselves in the foot
hint: the people you are deriding are ccp, not me |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 21:41:00 -
[48] - Quote
okay I guess you are deriding me too but my opinion matters a lot less than ccp's does |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 22:58:00 -
[49] - Quote
corbexx wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote:Rroff wrote: Can you imagine all the "but your not a member of a nullsec corp/alliance so what would you know" put downs? lol
point me at 'em when they come up and i'll strike them down just like I did here Going to assume you haven't lived in wh space at this point So to plagiarize and this isn't a direct attack at you. Here's the hard truth: If you don't live in W-space, and you've never lived there, your opinion about how W-space should or shouldn't be is worse than irrelevant: you are the virgin offering advice on how to get laid. Like a virgin, you probably genuinely believe that your opinion matters and that the mere fact that you have no personal experience on the topic shouldn't invalidate your opinion, while everyone else listening to you is quietly shaking their head. I'll leave you now to go and strike them down in the comments on http://themittani.com/content/traffic-control-unknown-virgins sorry about that, had to go to a meeting
the mittani is wrong and that article is hot buttered sewage because he's falling into the same trap that you guys are -- your alliance does not indicate your ability to speak about a subject
though if you must know
I spent about a year in a C5 with a C5 static
this is completely irrelevant to anything we've talked about, however and you and everyone else continue to lean on this "you must live in wormholes to be able to speak about them" crutch because you have no capacity for making a rational argument
how is ccp supposed to see your side when all you can say is "you haven't lived it, you have no say in the matter" |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 23:10:00 -
[50] - Quote
Valenthe de Celine wrote:I'd not wanted to get involved in yet another troll session, but the Goonswarm individual's take on a wormhole doesn't seem to have any bearing in what the disconnect of living without a safety net does to us..
Imagining what it's like to live in a wormhole is nothing like the isolation, the unknown dangers, and the sheer lack of anchor-points that no local, no gates, and no stations does to your perception of space inside a wormhole. We do things to improve this, but in the end the perception of where you are and where "safety" lies is completely different than in any area of K-space I've been to.
There is no fast way to get help, no backup unless your friends are already in there with you and a phone call away, and no way out unless you probe it down, and then you know someone may already be there, waiting, ready to jump you. Or it could just be a completely empty system with a dead stick at planet IV, moon 2. Well, and 17 sigs and another 38 anomalies, but who's counting? for someone who is trying to assert that the game experience imparts some incalculable je ne sais quoi about game mechanics you are making an awful lot of assumptions about nullsec yourself
for instance
i myself do not play in a group, despite being a member of a predominately nullsec alliance
feel free to run locators on me or anyone in my corp that is not obviously a cyno alt, you'll find that I am predominantly in lowsec
i don't have the theoretical safety net you describe because I play solo -- if I **** up, I'm dead, no one is rescuing my ass
goonswarm to me is largely a jabber channel with the odd bit of empire-related entertainment to me |
|

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 23:16:00 -
[51] - Quote
corbexx wrote:ok so you know you dont roll wh's with 3 dreads? right cos one of the issues is you have people who say they do know stuff and comment when what they say leads towards them not knowing and making comments based on the wrong info see, was that so hard? it only took four pages for one of you to finally find a hole in my knowledge
i swear i give you all the perfect amount of rope to hang me and you sit around going "huh what's the rope for"
it was a fat finger unfortunately, and for that I do apologize
a C5 hole typically has a maximum mass of 3b and a dread has 1.2-1.3 or so, you'd want to roll with 2 to avoid locking someone out |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 23:17:00 -
[52] - Quote
Valenthe de Celine wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote:[...]
I spent about a year in a C5 with a C5 static
this is completely irrelevant to anything we've talked about, however and you and everyone else continue to lean on this "you must live in wormholes to be able to speak about them" crutch because you have no capacity for making a rational argument
[...] By your statement here, then, I have every right to dictate what happens in Nullsec despite never having spent more than an hour there? Gonna have to save this for later, so I can use it when the Nullsec changes are live on SiSi without prior statements to anyone who lives there. Then I can toss this little gem back at you and your peers out in the donut. dictate, no
comment on, yes
i am dictating nothing itt and neither are you |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 23:35:00 -
[53] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: see, was that so hard? it only took four pages for one of you to finally find a hole in my knowledge
i swear i give you all the perfect amount of rope to hang me and you sit around going "huh what's the rope for"
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4951074#post4951074Thats actually the 2nd time I pointed out holes in that post as well :S was because you edited it in; didn't catch it the first time |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 23:38:00 -
[54] - Quote
it's still curious to me though
why did you wait so long to just say the thing I got wrong
you could have saved so much time on this by just pointing it out
consider it a token lesson for next time
with 12 hours on the clock I doubt it matters much now :sun: |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 02:49:00 -
[55] - Quote
corbexx wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote:it's still curious to me though
why did you wait so long to just say the thing I got wrong
you could have saved so much time on this by just pointing it out
consider it a token lesson for next time
with 12 hours on the clock I doubt it matters much now :sun: Tbh I just wanted to post my main post but then I after the discussion, I went back to check some of your stuff. Frankly I couldn't careless about where you live in game or what you do. Your right, you are free to comment on stuff, that's fine. But the issue is you come on here you post all this stuff about what you think of the change, when you don't even understand the very basics of the change. Closing a c5 to c5 is literally one of the easiest wormholes in game to close. Now if you don't understand the very basic stuff and get that wrong how are any of us meant to take the rest of what you say seriously. How can you comment on the more complex things of how this will effect people when you don't know the basics? This isn't even that much a issue, its just you posting on these forums and most the wormhole people will know its rubbish. what's much more of a issue is when you get so called wormhole "experts" on certain podcasts talking about this stuff and getting the basics wrong, like saying "ooh 2 dreads and a orca to roll a c5 c5" or "yeah with the change you'll be spawning 20 to 50km" thats much more of a issue cos there listeners just assume there correct when in fact its total ballshit. That leads to people making decisions based on stuff that's just not correct. Your much better posting from a educated position. Its one of the reasons i get so pissed off when people mention isk in wh space when they are literally pulling numbers out there arse with no facts or anything to back it up. yeah I wasn't indicting you specifically, you were the one poster who actually was able to nut up and call me out despite my mistake happening many pages ago
was just marveling at how poorly the rest of you all are fighting for your lives here |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
432
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 03:18:00 -
[56] - Quote
OMEGA REDUX wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: yeah I wasn't indicting you specifically, you were the one poster who actually was able to nut up and call me out despite my mistake happening many pages ago
was just marveling at how poorly the rest of you all are fighting for your lives here
actually the rest of us are just marveling at how incompetent you are. oh please
I didn't make my mistake for several pages and there you all were reciting your "wormhole players are the only people authorized to make changes" creed way before I even allowed myself the rope to make a mistake |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
433
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 04:05:00 -
[57] - Quote
OMEGA REDUX wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Bleedingthrough wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: you people keep saying that but are unable to come up with one example of what this means
why is this so difficult to do
Maybe because this is not a "101- help the newbie" thread. These guys don't need to explain what is obvious for everyone living in w-space. Really? That's funny, because "these guys" have been accusing CCP of having no experience with w-space. I should think that it'd be apparently at this point that you do need to explain these things, regardless of how obvious they seem to you. That seems to be your best hope at convincing them why you feel this is a bad change. the past 100+ pages devoted to this have had "101 wh stuffs" over and over and over and over and...ya also one of the biggest reasons for the csm is so ccp can speak to the actual experts and csm corbexx has done his job, it's ccp fozzie that hasnt by not listening to him nor the rest of us. and yet it took you 9 pages to point out my mistake
it's almost like the entire wormhole community is shockingly bad at communication |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
433
|
Posted - 2014.08.26 04:22:00 -
[58] - Quote
OMEGA REDUX wrote:with all the trolls i guess this is why customer service is so ****** from game companies what do you care, you said yourself you were leaving either the game or wormhole space, I forget which |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
434
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 23:05:00 -
[59] - Quote
lmbo |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
434
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 05:33:00 -
[60] - Quote
Gunner GzR wrote:Sentamon wrote:Anyone remember the ice miner tears? 95% were against the change to remove unlimited ice. Now ice mining is better and more profitable then ever.
Adapt and quit crying. The only mistake CCP made was letting safe-holes go on for this long. Safe holes lol you have no idea what you are talking about null bear..Lets remove local From Null ..heck lets remove local from low sec as well..Safe holes..Get a clue. pretty sure that is an npc corp poster which is not known for its presence in nullsec |
|

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
434
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 15:03:00 -
[61] - Quote
man epicurus ataraxia if you think anyone is reading your walls of text this late after the game you are sadly mistaken
i've written lorem ipsum generators that make more sense than you at this point |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
435
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 17:38:00 -
[62] - Quote
in this thread we learned that feedback does not mean capitulating to demands |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
435
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 23:58:00 -
[63] - Quote
y'all do realize that feedback can be received and not acted upon without breaking the general social contract of the solicitation of feedback right
shoot I got a lot of stuff that I don't like about the game but me agreeing or disagreeing with a change in a feedback thread is not the sole arbitrator of whether or not a thing goes into the game
sometimes balance changes have to go through, that is the way it is |
|
|
|